I just want to give you a big heads up, please go ahead. I like the idea. All new code is reviewed, if it's good, it goes in, if it's not, it won't. Writing from my cell, I'll write more when I get home on Tuesday. Ondrej
On 6/22/08, physnut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hey there Ondrej, > > Do you think it would be a good idea to include MPI/BSP > parallelization capability? I think there will probably be no big > problem in using the modules already included with scipy/Scientific > for that, but perhaps integrated into sympy could be good if it is to > be a fully featured CAS in its own right. Given this it may be that > most people are not interested in threading most of their CAS routines/ > doodlings it may be best to leave it up to external modules and > concentrate on other features (when I have done a bit more playing and > have some time I would like to write a tutorial on concurrency with > sympy). > > Something along these lines which I think would be really cool (given > that everyone and their grandma has more than one core these days...I > found a decent dual core in a skip!), would be to enable an option to > enable sympy to use SMP.... routines that look easily threadable could > then be practically automagically split among all available cores by > the kernel, needing only the user to specify which computations in a > batch are threadsafe (don't know if this would be so doable for messy > systems like windows). It may be possible then for the user to > relatively seamlessly take advantage of their whole system... of > course, again, this could be something which is not so applicable to > most users and may be best left to other modules...thoughts? > > On Jun 16, 12:36 am, "Ondrej Certik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I started making a roadmap for SymPy 1.0 here: >> >> http://wiki.sympy.org/wiki/Plan_for_SymPy_1.0 >> >> Are there some features missing, or something not necessary? I am not >> talking about some specific CAS features in there, those can be added >> anytime anyone is interested and writes a patch. >> I am just pointing out features, that basically all of us want sympy >> to do, so they have high priority. I think it could be doable by the >> end of the year. >> >> Ondrej > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
