Did you see the above discussion about how to handle the *args part of it? I don't think we want to simply pass *args on to self.subs.
Brian On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 11:13 AM, llarsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oops. Last post got sent before I was finished. Anyway, as I mentioned > I modified the code to accept the f(x=1,y=2), but the __call__ method > was already a part of the basic class. I modified subs to accept the > syntax f.subs(x=1, y=2) and changed the call function to forward > directly to the subs function: > > def __call__(self, *args, **kwargs): > return self.subs(*args, **kwargs) > > The changes seem to work fine, but some test cases failed... Just > realized that I may have some python path issues causing my tests to > give spurious failures. Once I have addressed this and checked tests I > will give an update. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
