Vinzent Steinberg wrote: > You could use tcc [1], which is much faster (especially if you use > libtcc and avoid any file creation -- sadly it's usually a pain to set > it up). See sympy/utilities/compilef.py for an interface. There is > also some primitive and specialized code generation. > > The advantage of gcc is of course it's spread.
I would not drop normal cc or gcc in favor of tcc. I'd do both. Thanks for the tip. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
begin:vcard fn:Toon Verstraelen n:Verstraelen;Toon org:Ghent University;Center for Molecular Modeling adr:;;Proeftuinstraat 86;Ghent;;9000;Belgium email;internet:toon.verstrae...@ugent.be title:ir. tel;work:+32 (0) 9 264 65 56 tel;home:+32 (0) 9 351 56 05 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://molmod.ugent.be version:2.1 end:vcard
