I suspected this. So, given this bit of information, what are people's opinions?
Aaron Meurer On Oct 24, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 15:25, Priit Laes <plaes...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> So why is it needed: >> 1) Although I cannot find the reference at the moment, a file must >> contain copyright notice with licensing information, otherwise it can be >> viewed as public domain and thus can be freely relicensed by anyone. > > You will not be able to find such a reference because it does not > exist. Almost all countries in the world are signatories to the Berne > Convention. Under the Berne Convention, copyright is automatic. It > does not require an explicit copyright statement anywhere much less > attached to each file in a package. The LICENSE file already present > is quite sufficient legally. > > -- > Robert Kern > > "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless > enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as > though it had an underlying truth." > -- Umberto Eco -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
