Tom: Apologies, but I'm having trouble inferring what you github username is -- where is the branch?
Fredrik: I like the idea, but that seems like a massive shift in the SymPy core that I don't feel is possible in the time frame that the assumptions need to be fixed in. On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Tom Bachmann <ness...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Alright, so I took Vinzent's old branch and made the most important > things work over current master - see my local_assump branch [*]. I > also added the hashing extensions for caching I described. Now only > someone has to be daring enough to rewrite all the .is_foo properties > and see how much breaks. > > [*] There are a few test failures, but nothing unfixable. > > @Haz: Can you take a look if this implementation of caching is still > amenable to the problems you described? There is a test in > test_cache.py that you could take as a baseline. > > Even if we decide that assumptions should all be passed around > explicitely, I think assumption injection is a good transition > strategy. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
