On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Ronan Lamy <ronan.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le samedi 26 novembre 2011 à 14:06 +0100, Joachim Durchholz a écrit : >> Issue link: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2867 >> >> The idea here is to have a lambda expression instead of a string. >> I.e. instead of >> >>> raises(TypeError, "Rational(2)*MyInt") >> we want >> >>> raises(TypeError, lambda: Rational(2)*MyInt) >> >> This works very well, except when the code needs to test a statement >> instead of an exception. I'd like to hear how to deal with these. > > As with most problems concerning the test suite, the best solution would > be to use pytest: [http://pytest.org/latest/builtin.html#pytest.raises].
Alright, so is there any reason we can't move back to pytest now? I know Aaron and Ondrej want to keep SymPy working in "pure" Python, but development dependencies are fine and a normal users doesn't really need to run tests. I also know you've been working on making us compatible again, how is that progressing? Aaron, Ondrej, what were the original reasons for moving away from py.test and do they still apply? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > > -- Vladimir Perić -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
