On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Aaron Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Vladimir Perić <vlada.pe...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Ronan Lamy <ronan.l...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Le samedi 26 novembre 2011 à 14:06 +0100, Joachim Durchholz a écrit : >>>> Issue link: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2867 >>>> >>>> The idea here is to have a lambda expression instead of a string. >>>> I.e. instead of >>>> >>> raises(TypeError, "Rational(2)*MyInt") >>>> we want >>>> >>> raises(TypeError, lambda: Rational(2)*MyInt) >>>> >>>> This works very well, except when the code needs to test a statement >>>> instead of an exception. I'd like to hear how to deal with these. >>> >>> As with most problems concerning the test suite, the best solution would >>> be to use pytest: [http://pytest.org/latest/builtin.html#pytest.raises]. >> >> Alright, so is there any reason we can't move back to pytest now? I >> know Aaron and Ondrej want to keep SymPy working in "pure" Python, but >> development dependencies are fine and a normal users doesn't really >> need to run tests. I also know you've been working on making us >> compatible again, how is that progressing? >> >> Aaron, Ondrej, what were the original reasons for moving away from >> py.test and do they still apply? > > I don't know. That happened before I joined the project. Ondrej, > Mateusz, or Vinzent might know. > > Aaron Meurer
By the way, I'm not opposed to it, as long as we don't lose any major functionality. Aaron Meurer -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
