>> That's exactly what I thought... I wasn't receiving them!
Cool. You've just confirmed a question I raised here a few years agoand
never got answered <g>. I'm often surprised if I go into the mailing list
archive, that many more messages show up than I ever directly received.
There's definitely a problem there. And now your mailing list queries are
much more understandable. (heck, that would have been a good fact to
mention...)
>> The time frame wasn't that short. I sent a bug report over a month ago
regarding a pretty bad bug in the IPv6 address conversion code and never got
a reply. <<
Yup. I was surprised at that one too (though it is a different topic). I
wanted to work with it, but it was considerably more non-trivial than I
expected <g>, we're not using IPv6 yet (but want to prepare for it soon),
and it couldn't even be remotely justified, in the face of overwhelming
work. So I dropped it after a short investigation. (But did put it (low) on
a To Do List <G>)
>> To be honest, I don't think I have pressed for anything. <<
My statement was actually that your "pressing need" for the code may be
"influencing your expectations." I was trying to be safe with my reading
and interpretations as I've been hit with several health problems over the
last few weeks, that even if they aren't necessarily making me irritable at
any particular moment, are definitely keeping me off balance. I may have
been amalgamating messages and impressions, but did make an effort to
re-read and understand as best I could.
I don't know that I can provide much help, BUT, if you can provide an SNMP
server to test against, and a test harness of code (presumably what you're
using), I may give a shot at debugging it. (I have on occasions successfully
debugged things I didn't really understand <g>. But this would definitely
seem a long shot.) If you don't want to publicize the code or the server,
you can mail it to this email account directly.
At the very least I'll try not to be counter-productive ! And at least
there'll be another set of eyes on the subject...
[Oh yeah: If you happen to know of any test vectors for the process (not the
encryption, that ought to be verified by now), that'd be good to know... ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
synalist-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
