On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 11:18 +0100, Alain Knaff wrote: > On 02/11/11 11:14, Patrick Ohly wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 10:50 +0100, Alain Knaff wrote: > >> On 02/11/11 10:08, Patrick Ohly wrote: > >>>> As far as I understand this distinction between CURLPOPT_CAINFO and > >>>> CURLPOPT_CAPATH is platform independent. > >>> > >>> The distinction is, but support for CAPATH isn't. With "platform" I mean > >>> both the hardware and the OS on top of it, which includes whether > >>> libcurl uses OpenSSL or GnuTLS. > >>> > >> > >> ok. So what happens with GnuTLS if you pass a directory with > >> CURLPOPT_CAINFO? > >> Does GnuTLS interpret this as a directory which contains files with CA > >> certificates? > > > > My guess is that it simply won't work because GnuTLS expects (and only > > supports) a single file. I've never tried it, so I don't know what the > > resulting error message is. > > > > Well in that case, what harm could be done by putting the test for file > or directory into the app?
None. As I said, I don't mind adding the code. But before doing it and asking Ove to create new binaries, I wanted to be sure that it really has a chance of improving the situation. I also wanted to explain why SyncEvolution and it's documentation is so fuzzy about these options. In many cases it doesn't know what the string values will do in the underlying layers. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
