Is the Syncope team willing / planning to engage Forgerock to see if they can team up for connector development / agree on a framework? Seems like a wasted oppertunity and not beneficial to Forgerock and Syncope users if both are doing their own thing.
regards. On 19 Apr, 2012, at 10:13 , Fabio Martelli <[email protected]> wrote: > > Il giorno 19/apr/2012, alle ore 10.04, Jordi Clement ha scritto: > >> Yep, I've been keeping an eye on OpenICF as well. Looks interesting. Are >> these connectors interchangeable, ie: can we use the connectors provided by >> ForgeRock in Syncope as well? > > Hi Jordi, > we should be able to use OpenICF. > > Unfortunately I cannot be sure about this because I don't know if ForgeRock > changed the original framework core. > ConnId kept the identity framework core as it was at fork time and Syncope, > till now, has been developed to be fully compatible with it. > > Regards, > F. > >> >> regards. >> >> On 19 Apr, 2012, at 9:57 , René Mulder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Has anyone seen the OpenICF framework that ForgeRock made? Could be >>> interesting. >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: <[email protected]> >>> Date: Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:48 AM >>> Subject: [syncope-dev] Re: Issue 277 in syncope: Scripted SQL connector >>> bundle >>> To: [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> Comment #1 on issue 277 by [email protected]: Scripted SQL connector >>> bundle >>> http://code.google.com/p/**syncope/issues/detail?id=277<http://code.google.com/p/syncope/issues/detail?id=277> >>> >>> ForgeRock has already adopted the ICF framework under the name OpenICF and >>> provides a Scripted SQL connector. >> >
