Il giorno 19/apr/2012, alle ore 10.45, Jordi Clement ha scritto: > Is the Syncope team willing / planning to engage Forgerock to see if they can > team up for connector development / agree on a framework? Seems like a wasted > oppertunity and not beneficial to Forgerock and Syncope users if both are > doing their own thing.
I've just proposed to the Syncope team this kind of discussion. Your participation is well accepted. Regards, F. > On 19 Apr, 2012, at 10:13 , Fabio Martelli <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Il giorno 19/apr/2012, alle ore 10.04, Jordi Clement ha scritto: >> >>> Yep, I've been keeping an eye on OpenICF as well. Looks interesting. Are >>> these connectors interchangeable, ie: can we use the connectors provided by >>> ForgeRock in Syncope as well? >> >> Hi Jordi, >> we should be able to use OpenICF. >> >> Unfortunately I cannot be sure about this because I don't know if ForgeRock >> changed the original framework core. >> ConnId kept the identity framework core as it was at fork time and Syncope, >> till now, has been developed to be fully compatible with it. >> >> Regards, >> F. >> >>> >>> regards. >>> >>> On 19 Apr, 2012, at 9:57 , René Mulder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Has anyone seen the OpenICF framework that ForgeRock made? Could be >>>> interesting. >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: <[email protected]> >>>> Date: Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 9:48 AM >>>> Subject: [syncope-dev] Re: Issue 277 in syncope: Scripted SQL connector >>>> bundle >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Comment #1 on issue 277 by [email protected]: Scripted SQL connector >>>> bundle >>>> http://code.google.com/p/**syncope/issues/detail?id=277<http://code.google.com/p/syncope/issues/detail?id=277> >>>> >>>> ForgeRock has already adopted the ICF framework under the name OpenICF and >>>> provides a Scripted SQL connector. >>> >> >
