> -----Original Message----- > From: Miao Fuyou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 10:40 AM > To: Rainer Gerhards; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document > > > > > I questioned the need for a version number for the TLS > transport in > > > private conversation and now I bring this up again here. > > > > Was that private? I thought it was on-list. Anyhow... I > > The public messege can be found at: > http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01273.html > > It seems there was a rough concensus that the version number > was welcomed to > save port resource when we discussed this issue on the > mailing list. That is > the reason why a version number is there.
Agreed, I am guilty of not saying "I agree" on the mailing list. But to me that did not look like consensus but simply an overlooked message (there were no responses at all...). Rainer _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
