Miao, > -----Original Message----- > From: Miao Fuyou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 2:24 AM > To: Rainer Gerhards > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document > > > > > The public messege can be found at: > > > http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01273.html > > > > > > It seems there was a rough concensus that the version number was > > > welcomed to save port resource when we discussed this > issue on the > > > mailing list. That is the reason why a version number is there. > > > > Agreed, I am guilty of not saying "I agree" on the mailing > > list. But to me that did not look like consensus but simply > > an overlooked message (there were no responses at all...). > > > > Don't feel guilty because you did say "I applaude":-) > http://www1.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/syslog/current/msg01198.html > > I also found support from other active WG members.
Yes, I know I did say that at that time. But the new Argument from Juergen was convincing to me. During the nearly 4 years of -protocol, we have often revised our view based on new arguments and I think this good. > Anyway, let's reconsider the decision and make it right! Good point. It would be helpful if some other WG members could voice an opinion. We are on a thight deadline. There are only very few things for dicsussion in -transport-tls. If we act fast, I am confident Miao will be able to very quickly create a new revision (if necessary). Rainer > > > Rainer > > > > > _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
