<inline>
Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rainer Gerhards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Miao Fuyou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2006 8:47 AM
Subject: RE: [Syslog] Updated Syslog-tls Document


Hi Miao,

<inline>

Rainer

<snip>
>
> > - cipher suites and such are left to the operator. We should
> > indicate the (serious) consequences of this selection
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > One note on the cipher suites:
> > I know there has been some discussion previously, but I
> > wasn't able to find the post in question in the archive.
> > Probably you can help me out.
> >
> > Question: how do we guarantee a minimum interoperability of
> > implementations of this document if we do not specify any
> > cipher suite?
> >
>
> Tom and I discussed this issue on the mailing list. TLS
> protocol has its
> mandatory suite (TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA), and TLS
> specification says
> that if application profile(syslog-tls in this case) does not
> specify a
> mandatory cipher suite, TLS mandatory suite will apply. So, no need to
> specify one in this specification.

Ahh... that was the message I did not find in the archive. Thanks for
bringing it up again. That obiously solves the interop problem. However,
I am still of the view that we should advise operators to use strong
suites in the security considerations section.

<tp>

I raised it because I wanted a cipher suite spelt out in the I-D rather then
leaving it as an exercise in ingenuity for the reader to find where it is
specified.  The pro and con of not specifying it in our I-D is that as the views
in the security community change (and some would regard the default as too
weak - eg US government) so the mandatory to implement is changed for us without
us noticing.

Tom Petch

___


____________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog


_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

Reply via email to