Op 7 apr. 2013, om 22:11 heeft Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> het volgende geschreven:
> > > Am 07.04.2013 22:04, schrieb Koen Kooi: >> >> Op 7 apr. 2013, om 11:47 heeft Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> het >> volgende geschreven: >> >>> >>> >>> Am 07.04.2013 09:56, schrieb Koen Kooi: >>>> >>>> Op 6 apr. 2013, om 22:41 heeft Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> het >>>> volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>>> Am 06.04.2013 22:37, schrieb Askar Safin: >>>>>>> What is "primary arch"? The arch of init? ls? the package manager? >>>>>> As far as I know today there is no true symmetric multiarch. Every >>>>>> multiarched system has one clear primary arch. And several additional >>>>>> arches. So, today (I think) the parameter ARCH should content all arches >>>>>> and the primary arch should go first. If this situation changes in the >>>>>> future, then ARCH can be list of equal arches. >>>>>> >>>>>>> usually the kernel ones? >>>>>> Yes, this is good idea. But then, of course, this is arch of this >>>>>> system's own kernel, not arch of current running kernel. >>>>> >>>>> i would wonder if this below is not predictable the arch from the running >>>>> kernel >>>>> >>>>> [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ /usr/bin/uname -i >>>>> x86_64 >>>> >>>> No, run that kernel on a 32bit Atom cpu and it will still return x86_64 >>> >>> how will you do that? >> >> Enable 64 bit support and 32 bit compat, build, boot > > bullshit, you can not run a 64bit kernel on a 32bit CPU > the other direction yes, but not this way Yes, you can, just set CONFIG_64BIT and 32 bit compat, the kernel will run fine on an Atom E6xx and uname will report x86_64. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
