Op 7 apr. 2013, om 11:47 heeft Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> het volgende geschreven:
> > > Am 07.04.2013 09:56, schrieb Koen Kooi: >> >> Op 6 apr. 2013, om 22:41 heeft Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> het >> volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Am 06.04.2013 22:37, schrieb Askar Safin: >>>>> What is "primary arch"? The arch of init? ls? the package manager? >>>> As far as I know today there is no true symmetric multiarch. Every >>>> multiarched system has one clear primary arch. And several additional >>>> arches. So, today (I think) the parameter ARCH should content all arches >>>> and the primary arch should go first. If this situation changes in the >>>> future, then ARCH can be list of equal arches. >>>> >>>>> usually the kernel ones? >>>> Yes, this is good idea. But then, of course, this is arch of this system's >>>> own kernel, not arch of current running kernel. >>> >>> i would wonder if this below is not predictable the arch from the running >>> kernel >>> >>> [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ /usr/bin/uname -i >>> x86_64 >> >> No, run that kernel on a 32bit Atom cpu and it will still return x86_64 > > how will you do that? Enable 64 bit support and 32 bit compat, build, boot. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
