On Sat, Apr 06, 2013 at 10:41:44PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 06.04.2013 22:37, schrieb Askar Safin: > >> What is "primary arch"? The arch of init? ls? the package manager? > > As far as I know today there is no true symmetric multiarch. Every > > multiarched system has one clear primary arch. And several additional > > arches. So, today (I think) the parameter ARCH should content all arches > > and the primary arch should go first. If this situation changes in the > > future, then ARCH can be list of equal arches. > > > >> usually the kernel ones? > > Yes, this is good idea. But then, of course, this is arch of this system's > > own kernel, not arch of current running kernel. > > i would wonder if this below is not predictable the arch from the running > kernel > > [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ /usr/bin/uname -i > x86_64 Exactly. Current arch is easily accessible through standard tools, e.g. uname(1) and uname (2), and there's little point in putting this in a static file which can become outdated on next boot. Also, with debian/ubuntu multiarch, the difference between primary arch and the rest is quite thin.
Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
