Am 07.04.2013 09:56, schrieb Koen Kooi: > > Op 6 apr. 2013, om 22:41 heeft Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> het > volgende geschreven: >> >> Am 06.04.2013 22:37, schrieb Askar Safin: >>>> What is "primary arch"? The arch of init? ls? the package manager? >>> As far as I know today there is no true symmetric multiarch. Every >>> multiarched system has one clear primary arch. And several additional >>> arches. So, today (I think) the parameter ARCH should content all arches >>> and the primary arch should go first. If this situation changes in the >>> future, then ARCH can be list of equal arches. >>> >>>> usually the kernel ones? >>> Yes, this is good idea. But then, of course, this is arch of this system's >>> own kernel, not arch of current running kernel. >> >> i would wonder if this below is not predictable the arch from the running >> kernel >> >> [harry@srv-rhsoft:~]$ /usr/bin/uname -i >> x86_64 > > No, run that kernel on a 32bit Atom cpu and it will still return x86_64
how will you do that?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
