--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Slavery was pretty "embedded" as a fact of life in the South before > the Civil War, and the "feasability" of changing it was low--very > low--nearly impossible (most would have said)--but it was finally > changed because a small group of passionate people felt committed to > what they believed was right.
Simple enough, let's just go to war to put an end to performance enhancing drugs. That is, after all, what ended slavery. Not any moral high road. All that aside, it's a lot easier to prove someone is partaking in slavery than it is to prove they are on undetectable drugs. > Is there in fact general agreement that it's not a health issue > and it's not a moral issue? What kind of an issue is it? That's just it, there's no clear definition of what sort of issue it is. "It's wrong" seems the best attempt made thus far. Dan ===== http://AbleDesign.com - Web Design & Custom Programming http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Fantasy T&F ------------------------------------------------------------ @ o Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED] <|\/ <^- ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) _/ \ \/\ (503)370-9969 phone/fax / / __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
