RMc
At 09:15 PM 10/15/2003 -0400, malmo wrote:
Perhaps you misspoke, or perhaps this is yet another of your embellishments? Salazar's debut was never under the WR.
We're all track fans here and you have little chance of getting any your numerous whoppers past us. Why keep trying? I just don't get it?
malmo
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard McCann Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 2:15 PM To: alan tobin Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Re: t-and-f: fwd: Marathon debutant Rutto, Boston champ Zakharova win at Chicago
>The record KK came within 20 seconds of wasn't 2 weeks old but 9 years >old. It should also be known that KK isn't off my suspicion list either.
So now a 9 year old record is considered weak, and it's OK for a debut mark to be near that record? Rutto's debut was 8 seconds off a 4 year old record mark--that doesnt' seem too out of line. And remember that Salazar's debut was momentarily under the old WR, and even with the time
correction was extremely close.
RMc
>I think we should adopt the cycling federations hematocrit test. If >you're >over 50 then you're out for "health reasons"
The ICU is refusing to join the WADA. I don't know the circumstances, but perhaps someone can fill us in on the reasons. I know that cycling may be dumped from the Olympics for this.
RMc
>Alan
