On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 3:59 PM, John Smith <deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com>wrote:
> On 5 May 2010 23:54, Jonas Minnberg <sas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So OK, I can leave sidewalks (even though to be consistent you should > then > > draw sidewalks next to every street in the city that has them). > > That's where things are headed, removing existing ones only delays the > inevitable... > > > A bad compromise would be to leave the park area and retag it as > > fixme=looked_green_on_satellite or something, but that approach would > just > > leave lots of useless areas... > > If they aren't parks, then what are they? They are trees or sometimes small areas of grass next to buildings. For instance; http://maps.google.se/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=sv&geocode=&q=medborgarplatsen,+stockholm&sll=61.606396,21.225586&sspn=41.151386,107.138672&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=Medborgarplatsen,+Stockholm&ll=59.314198,18.076335&spn=0.001299,0.00327&t=h&z=19&layer=c&cbll=59.314194,18.076695&panoid=61og8jFQ7ZeAS1UebY-7gg&cbp=12,275.23,,0,15.04 In this case there was a park on that sidewalk. Here I am considering adding tree_lined=yes to the street. But overlapping with landuse=wood seems insane. (Sorry for using google streetview but it was the easiest way to show the problem). -- Sasq
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
