OK, I think I'm beginning to understand the lay of the land. What I most wanted to get acknowledged is that data gathered first hand on street level should trump data traced from low-res satellite images.
I will not remove any walkways or cycleways that are adjacent to other ways. I will align POI:s to walls or slightly inside for "storefront" shops,pubs etc. I will remove incorrect areas obviously defined from only looking at satellite images, unless I can tag them to something that fits. I will not join together joining areas since there doesn't seem to be consensus on that. In short, I can forget about consistency but hopefully be able to remove things that are wrong - and I mean wrong when considered by a person actually looking at the thing. Concerning shops - I think that the POI should be placed just inside the door, even if the shops main area is further inside. You remember shops locations by their storefronts. (Not for shops inside malls of course.) On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 4:46 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com>wrote: > 2010/5/5 Jonas Minnberg <sas...@gmail.com>: > > Shouldn't you expect - you know - *grass* in areas with landuse=grass ? > :9 > > > > Seriously though, from the image of the actual street you can see that it > is > > a sidewalk. The only people who see the green surface are the ones flying > > over it. > > I must admit I didn't look at your link at first (shame). I agree, > there is no park and no grass ;-) > What you could do is tag the trees as natural=tree on nodes (others > might advocate tree-lined tags on the road). > > cheers, > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging