Makes sense. So we're back to amenity. Something like amenity=shelter + shelter_type=field_shelter + (if necessary) access=private should cover it.
Martin 2013/2/6 Alberto <albertoferra...@fastwebnet.it>: > I'm against animal=shelter. As emerged in previous discussions, an animal is > not a shelter. > It exists amenity=animal_shelter [1] for large structures with a staff that > takes care of animals and that eventually heals them. > On taginfo already exists animal=shelter, and in many cases it has been used > to tag what now is tagged with amenity=animal_shelter. The migration is slow > because we have to check every single case. > For consistency with other shelter's tags [2], I would use: > amenity=shelter > shelter_type=field_shelter > The availability can be specified by access=* tags. > After all if you need a shelter against bad weather, you can use also a > field shelter, if it is accessible. In this sense consistency with > amenity=shelter tag is useful. > You should also update page on shelters [2] and on animals [3] when we'll > agree on field shelters' tagging. > > [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_shelter > [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type > [3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal > > Alberto - Viking81 > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
