Fernando, if you really were to implement a style, chances are you'd prefer
filter the data once for schools of the primary educational system, without
bothering for explicitely filtering out all possible additional tags for any
other kind of 'schools'.
Yves
Fernando Trebien <fernando.treb...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>I agree with Martin. If I were implementing a map renderer, it would be
>far
>easier to treat categorized things (such as school and restaurant)
>using
>the same visual style and same icon, instead of specifying each
>possible
>variation separately (I would need to know all possible values in that
>category and the app would definitely miss any new values until I
>manage to
>update it again). Same thing if I were implementing a POI menu in a
>navigation app. Same if I were compiling a list of places to print down
>(this way it easily transforms into a nice hierarchical index).
>
>And I don't see why this tagging style would prevent anyone from
>searching
>for a "Chinese restaurant": just search for amenity=restaurant +
>cuisine=chinese instead of amenity=chinese_restaurant. Similarly for
>language schools.
>
>So my vote goes for either:
>- amenity=school + (if not a regular school) training={driving,
>language,
>music, cram, etc.} (<< should work with practically all major
>applications); or
>- amenity=education + education={kindergarten, school, college,
>university,
>driving, language, music, cram, etc.}
>
>And definitely against amenity=driving_school, amenity=language_school,
>amenity=cram_school, amenity=business_school, amenity=computer_school,
>amenity=photography_school, amenity=dance_school, etc.
>
>On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:18 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
><dieterdre...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> 2013/9/6 Brad Neuhauser <brad.neuhau...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> Two big counter-examples to your argument are restaurants and places
>of
>>> worship: "If I'm looking for a [Chinese restaurant or Catholic
>church] I
>>> am not interested in finding also a [pizza restaurant or Synagogue]"
>>>
>>
>>
>> yes, but still it would be a restaurant or a place of worship, while
>a
>> language school has very few in common with a skiing school or a
>driving
>> school.
>>
>>
>> school 546360
>>> driving_school 3851
>>>
>>
>>
>> these two are also documented, something we should try for the rest
>as
>> well.
>>
>>
>>
>>> preschool 225
>>>
>>
>>
>> not a school IMHO ;-)
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>> And it goes on like that with things like cooking, dog, aviation,
>sailing,
>> art, etc schools. So if this seems like the way forward, it would at
>least
>> be good to document a list of values people can refer to.
>>
>>
>> +1, documentation is desirable, not sure if a common list does make a
>lot
>> of sense. Would you also include a "school of dolphins"? ;-) Sorry
>for the
>> groaner, but what I intend is that only because part of the word is
>> "school" doesn't necessarily mean that they belong to the same group
>of
>> stuff.
>>
>> cheers,
>> Martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Tagging mailing list
>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Fernando Trebien
>+55 (51) 9962-5409
>
>"The speed of computer chips doubles every 18 months." (Moore's law)
>"The speed of software halves every 18 months." (Gates' law)
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Tagging mailing list
>Tagging@openstreetmap.org
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
--
Envoyé de mon téléphone Android avec K-9 Mail. Excusez la brièveté._______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
