On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:27:45PM -0400, Christopher Hoess wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The image reminds me of a bridge, no longer open for traffic, on the old > > National Pike in Western Maryland. I can see where one might want to reduce > > speed on one of those to avoid bottoming out or becoming airborne. > > > > I think rather that bridge:structure=humpback I'd prefer > > bridge:geometry=humpback. At least something that conveys shape meaning. > > For me structure implies the design element that gives a building, bridge, > > dam, etc. its strength. In the case of the photo that would be masonry arch > > for structure. > > > > > +1. "Humpback" seems mostly to be defined by the aesthetic effect and the > potential effect on vehicles; there seems to be a popular "Humpback Bridge" > on Virginia that's a covered truss with a mild humpback. I'd rather not > dilute the more or less coherent nature of "bridge:structure=", although > better that than "bridge=". Although tagging it as some sort of highway > hazard or condition is not a bad idea either.
I was thinking maybe bridge:architecture would cover both "bridge:structure" and "bridge:geometry" but I guess it is too late to change? Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
