Andreas Labres wrote on 20.08.2014 04:10: > On 19.08.14 23:17, fly wrote: >> but 265-267 is wrong
Read as "tagging 265-267 alone is wrong". > Disagree. addr:housenumber is the official number given to that building. And > if > it's "265-267", then addr:housenumber=265-267 is the only correct > implementation > of this. But osm db needs a hint that 266 is missing. That is obvious on the street (by looking at the right and left building) but not in the data. > This is not a listing, this is a label only. We are not (only) painting nice maps. -- regards Holger Jeromin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
