We are supporting `smoothness` in iD. Now as of a month ago, we display friendlier (and translatable) text descriptions for these kinds of dropdown fields. (e.g. sac_scale, track type, trail_visibility, etc)
When I added these last month, I did borrow heavily from the descriptions on the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:smoothness. https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/blob/master/data/presets/fields/smoothness.json thanks, Bryan On Aug 30, 2014, at 12:01 PM, Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 2014-08-30 13:54 GMT+02:00 Paul Hartmann <phaau...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > there have been requests to include the tag smoothness=* in the JOSM presets > [1]. Everywhere the user can fill in surface=*, we would add an additional > option for smoothness=*. Apart from the value (excellent, good, ...) we would > include the explanation from the wiki into the selection combo box. > > Do you think this tag is considered mainstream by now or are there still many > people who oppose the usage of this tag? > > I know there have been lengthy discussions on this topic before and I don't > want to start another one. This is supposed to be something like a quick poll. > > [1] http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/6881 > > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > I use smoothness and I would welcome it in JOSM. I am not really happy about > it, but I was unable to invent something better and it > not as bad as say maxspeed:practical. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
