Looks like Amenity=soapland is more and more appealing. >< those libel laws... ouch. I thought the UK also had some pretty strict >libel laws too.
On Sep 24, 2014, at 1:26 AM, Matthijs Melissen <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote: > On 23 Sep 2014 16:29, "Mateusz Konieczny" <matkoni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Are you serious that in Thailand they have something like "criminal libel" > > defined as > > "any statement that harms the reputation of somebody/something"? > > In the Netherlands, this is the case as well. It is, basically, a criminal > offence to harm someones honour unless doing so is in the public interest. > > http://www.wetboek-online.nl/wet/Sr/261.html > > > In fact, I have the same problem with tagging Gentlemen's Clubs in > > England. How do other mappers tag these? From the outside, it's often > > hard to decide whether they should be tagged as leisure=social_club > > (typically not...), amenity=stripclub, or amenity=brothel. In England, > > brothelkeeping is illegal, so tagging them as amenity=brothel without > > evidence might again be risky from a legal perspective. > > I still wonder how other mappers deal with this. > > -- Matthijs > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
