Am 14.04.2015 um 23:35 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:40 PM, fly <lowfligh...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> Why not map the amenity/features as own objects ? >> >> If it is important for the route relations I rather have a new role >> similar to guidepost for the starting/end node. > > I agree the toilet/parking/information sign should all be tagged separately. > > But there are cases where the trail-head has a given and well known NAME. > So far I generally tag that on the parking area, but parking is not > necessarily a requirement for having a trailhead.
Sounds like place=location then. Cheers fly _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
