On 16.04.2015 06:25, Dave Swarthout wrote: > But I'd be willing to bet that most trails are not part of a network of > other trails or a route but are stand-alone. The trails I once hiked in the > Adirondack Mountains in New York State all have names and trailheads but, > with a couple of exceptions, are not part of any route. I think the mixed > approach is best. If a given trail is part of a larger system of trails, or > the area where it begins has related amenities, then the relation idea makes > sense. Otherwise, keeping it simple with a named trailhead node where the > transition from highway to footway takes place will suffice.
Without a relation, how can applications determine which trail the trailhead belongs to? Is it all about rendering the trailhead icon? -- Friedrich K. Volkmann http://www.volki.at/ Adr.: Davidgasse 76-80/14/10, 1100 Wien, Austria _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
