On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 06:42:02 -0500 Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Mateusz Konieczny > <matkoni...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I am looking for a better name - but for example [highway=footway; > > proposed=yes] may not be incorrect. It is not changing that such > > tagging should not be used as it makes OSM data less usable. > > > > How about highway=proposed, proposed=footway? This would be > orthogonal to present usage of highway=construction, > construction=footway. Yes, that is what I mentioned in my text as a proper solution. Obviously, only footways "that are about to be built, but where any construction work hasn't yet been started" should be mapped in this way. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
