Ooh, I think Martin's suggestion would become a MAJOR project. If I recall correctly, "right turn permitted on red after stop" is the traffic law in the entire United States with the sole exception of New York City. (Wikipedia says this has been the case since late 1978.)
Are you seriously suggesting that virtually every single traffic signal in the United States be tagged with "right turn permitted on red after stop" instead of tagging the few with "no turn on red"? How does this comport with the notion of tagging what you see -- the only signs you'll see in the USA are "no turn on red" (with the exception of NYC). John Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 17:06:59 +0200 > From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] "no right turn on red" tagging? > Message-ID: <45fed486-3423-40d5-80e4-5d6406fe0...@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > sent from a phone > > > Il giorno 02 lug 2016, alle ore 16:55, Nathan Wessel < nate.wes...@mail.utoronto.ca> ha critto: > > > > > > Who is right here? Should I report this as a bug and change the wiki to allow turns on ^no_.*" relations as standard or should the tagging be changed? And how? > > > > > right turn on red is something that isn't generally allowed, some countries do, some do if additional signs are posted. I'd suggest to explicitly tag the positive case (right turn on red is allowed), rather than assuming a default of yes and tag the negative cases. > > cheers, > Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
