The defaults per territory concept exists since a -very- long time (2008) ... http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions
In this case IMHO given that the sign doesn't actually change access/routing it simply modifies the meaning of the traffic signal, any tagging should be on the signal and a restriction relation doesn't actually make any sense. Simon Am 02.07.2016 um 18:17 schrieb Colin Smale: > > One of these days someone will introduce the concept of defaults per > territory. My prediction is that this suggestion will either get > mercilessly shot down in flames, or be quietly accepted, probably > depending on who suggests it. > > > > //colin > > On 2016-07-02 18:06, Johnparis wrote: > >> Ooh, I think Martin's suggestion would become a MAJOR project. >> >> If I recall correctly, "right turn permitted on red after stop" is >> the traffic law in the entire United States with the sole exception >> of New York City. (Wikipedia says this has been the case since late >> 1978.) >> >> Are you seriously suggesting that virtually every single traffic >> signal in the United States be tagged with "right turn permitted on >> red after stop" instead of tagging the few with "no turn on red"? How >> does this comport with the notion of tagging what you see -- the only >> signs you'll see in the USA are "no turn on red" (with the exception >> of NYC). >> >> John >> >> >> Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com >> <mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Message: 2 >> > Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2016 17:06:59 +0200 >> > From: Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com >> <mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> >> > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" >> > <tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>> >> > Subject: Re: [Tagging] "no right turn on red" tagging? >> > Message-ID: <45fed486-3423-40d5-80e4-5d6406fe0...@gmail.com >> <mailto:45fed486-3423-40d5-80e4-5d6406fe0...@gmail.com>> >> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >> > >> > >> > >> > sent from a phone >> > >> > > Il giorno 02 lug 2016, alle ore 16:55, Nathan Wessel >> <nate.wes...@mail.utoronto.ca <mailto:nate.wes...@mail.utoronto.ca>> >> ha critto: >> > > >> > > >> > > Who is right here? Should I report this as a bug and change the >> wiki to allow turns on ^no_.*" relations as standard or should the >> tagging be changed? And how? >> > > >> > >> > >> > right turn on red is something that isn't generally allowed, some >> countries do, some do if additional signs are posted. I'd suggest to >> explicitly tag the positive case (right turn on red is allowed), >> rather than assuming a default of yes and tag the negative cases. >> > >> > cheers, >> > Martin >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging