Agreed, but on this list discussion is in order, right? And here I didn't see anyone "desiring an authorative top down tagging system - derailing the community processes" .
At what usage level of a tag would you say a rendering proposal is appropriate? At what usage level should it be documented on the wiki pages? 2018-06-08 12:40 GMT+02:00 Christoph Hormann <o...@imagico.de>: > On Friday 08 June 2018, Peter Elderson wrote: > > > ... those who desire a strong hand and an authorative top > > > > down tagging system - by derailing the community processes .... > > > > I don't see anyone desiring and doing that in this discussion. Why > > the strawman argument? > > Just look at the edit histories of the wiki pages in question. > > Or as i have said in > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2018-June/036876.html > > > The problem here is that it is not just one or two, there is a > > significant group of people, at least a dozen overall i suppose, who > > on the wiki consider it their mission to educate mappers on correct > > use of tags (based on certain ideas regarding key semantics or data > > model ideas in general) rather than documenting their actual use. > > As i said again and again: The main purpose of the tag documentation on > the wiki is to document the actual use of tags. Abusing this platform > to push political ideas how tagging in OSM should look like according > to some opinion is what i call derailing the community processes. > > -- > Christoph Hormann > http://www.imagico.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Vr gr Peter Elderson
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
