sent from a phone
> On 23. Jul 2018, at 17:08, Jmapb <jm...@gmx.com> wrote: > > woke up to the conclusion that the attached/detached/semi-detached > distinction is not a great use of the building tag. As mentioned by André, we > can literally see on the map if these house footprints are attached via > shared party wall. it is not possible to do it reliably for terraced houses, because they are not only characterized by being attached. > So there's really no need to describe the attached-ness using the building > tag. .... So the building tag is freed up to describe the characteristic > style of the building -- hut, shed, bungalow, house, apartments, villa, > static_caravan if you agree with the list above it seems more consistent not to drop detached in favor of residential; detached, semi-detached and terraced are all subtypes of houses, there is some overlap with bungalows and villas. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
