On 7/23/2018 5:56 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
On 23. Jul 2018, at 17:08, Jmapb <jm...@gmx.com> wrote:
woke up to the conclusion that the attached/detached/semi-detached distinction
is not a great use of the building tag. As mentioned by André, we can literally
see on the map if these house footprints are attached via shared party wall.
it is not possible to do it reliably for terraced houses, because they are not
only characterized by being attached.
This is true. Once a terrace has been converted from a single
building=terrace way to a row of building=house ways, there's no sure
way to distinguish it from a group of same-sized adjacent non-terrace
houses. If we want to be able to pinpoint terraces, we should leave them
as building=terrace ways. The wiki, though, specifically encourages
breaking them up into houses.
Is it important to be able to query the map for terraces? If so, the
wiki should change. Change the text to favor a single building=terrace
way... or encourage a value like building=terrace_house when dividing
them up into individual residences. But my guess is that the number of
terraces already chopped up into building=house is so large that this
would be futile.
So there's really no need to describe the attached-ness using the building tag.
.... So the building tag is freed up to describe the characteristic style of
the building -- hut, shed, bungalow, house, apartments, villa, static_caravan
if you agree with the list above it seems more consistent not to drop detached
in favor of residential; detached, semi-detached and terraced are all subtypes
of houses, there is some overlap with bungalows and villas.
I don't consider that list to be canonical, just rattling off some of
the more popular typologies. But in my mind, if the attached-ness can be
visually seen on the map and geometrically determined by examining
adjacent ways (admittedly this would be a complex query -- can't even
begin to think how I'd code that in overpass) there's no need to crowd
that info into the value of the building tag.
Mainly, I'm doubting the need for building=detached -- it's a house, and
if it doesn't share a party wall with another building, then clearly
it's a detached house. But it's also true that the word "detached"
evokes a certain style of building, and if mappers think it's a good
value to describe a particular building, I'm not going to argue, or
advocate for retagging.
J
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
