On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 12:49 AM, François Lacombe <fl.infosrese...@gmail.com > wrote:
> > Indeed there are situations where many kind of clamping is used. I think > about line_clamp=mixed > Especially for such poles : https://previews.123rf.com/ > images/saovadee/saovadee1406/saovadee140600044/28858354- > electric-pole-with-messy-wire-that-look-dangerous.jpg > Yeah, all you could do with that one is line_clamp=mixed. The down/up/down situation you could maybe handle as line_clamp=suspension;pin;suspension. Insulators are a particular practical mean to do so especially for power > where conductors have to be separated from their supports as to prevent > electricity to go back to earth. > You don't have insulator here : https://wiki.openstreetmap. > org/wiki/File:Wooden_telecom_suspension_pole.jpeg > But it a suspension clamping. > That's true. Insulated cable, so the attachment isn't an insulator. The main point is to remove power dedicated values from tower:type. > As it's better to make it global, such values are extended to portals, > poles... > And to make it an order more global, let's not design it specific to power > anymore but suitable for telecom or any other line > That's how line_clamp came to my mind. > Should I update the proposal and rationale chapter? > Maybe. Or maybe you need different terminology. How about "line_attachment" rather than line_clamp? -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
