An other example : http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/k43_fyX2AuL594qhVuSY7w/photo abutter=residential and highway:legal_type=rural
Le mer. 19 sept. 2018 à 21:41, djakk djakk <djakk.dj...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Sound cool but there may be a gap between the reality and the law : > example : it looks like the countryside but legally it is inside the built > up area : > http://www.mapillary.com/map/im/Dybpz_fHGEmWdLjfG7OMvQ/photo > There should be 2 tags : abutters=rural and highway:legal_type=built_up > > > djakk > > > Le mer. 19 sept. 2018 à 21:27, Tobias Zwick <o...@westnordost.de> a écrit : > >> Okay, so US-American legislation usually differs between "residential >> district" and "business district" for maxspeed defaults, as opposed to >> "built-up area" in most other countries. >> >> Actually, there is a tag to denote that a street is in a residential >> district or business district. It comes from the early days of OSM where >> people were mapping with their GPS trackers for the lack of available >> aerial imagery. What about this?: >> >> abutters=residential >> abutters=commercial >> >> See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:abutters >> >> On 19/09/2018 14:08, Greg Troxel wrote: >> > Tod Fitch <t...@fitchdesign.com> writes: >> > >> >>> On Sep 18, 2018, at 6:19 PM, Joseph Eisenberg < >> joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> So on the boundary=administrative admin_level=6 for Rogers County, we >> could have something like maxspeed:type:default=45mph >> >> >> >> Except that more typically there will be different default speed >> >> limits on each of the various OSM highway classifications. So maybe >> >> something more like “maxspeed:default:residential=25 mph”. >> > >> > I am not aware of *unposted* default limits in the US being different by >> > an entity smaller than state. In Massachusetts, there are default >> > limits in state statutes, in particularly 30 mph in "thickly settled" >> > areas (also defined in statute). Some towns have adopted 25 mph in >> > thickly settled areas, and they have signs at the town borders. >> > >> > It's an interesting question at what level to tag individual roads and >> > when to have some way of expressing rules and therefore to expect all >> > data consumers to evaluate the rules. My quick reaction is that >> > publishing rules for regions smaller than states is going to be too >> > messy, vs just tagging the ways. >> > >> > With respect to maxspeed:default:residential, that's totally unworkable >> > in Massachusetts. The law does not talk about roads or even define them >> > as residential or not. The question for 30 (vs 40) is whether the road >> > is "thickly settled", which is >> > >> > built up with structures devoted to business, or the territory >> > contiguous to any way where the dwelling houses are situated at such >> > distances as will average less than two hundred feet between them for >> > a distance of a quarter of a mile or over. >> > >> > So there are many roads that are properly tagged "residential" but are >> > not subject to the lower speed. >> > >> > In Mass, we have speed limit tags on almost all legal roads. To me, >> > that seems like the most straightforward approach, even if there are >> > also defaults. >> > >> > If the general defaults are intended for routing, that seems more or >> > less ok. If they are intended to actually provide speed limit guidance >> > to drivers, I'm opposed, at least in jurisdictions where they aren't >> > strictly reliable. >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Tagging mailing list >> > Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging