On Sunday 02 August 2020, Paul Norman via Tagging wrote: > > I would consider an area mapped as water both with natural=coastline > and waterway=riverbank or natural=water in error. I haven't seen any > cases where this is done.
It is long term established practice at the Elbe and Weser in Germany: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/57390762 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/250290462 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3352832 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/28115705 If you consider that incorrect you also have to ask yourself if you draw the same conclusion for natural=bay and natural=strait polygons: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1675626 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/9072799 Even though the overall range of positions is not that large the specific placement of the coastline closure is often not done with a lot of consideration. That would certainly very much improve if we had visual feedback on the water differentiation in OSM-Carto: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/4128 -- Christoph Hormann http://www.imagico.de/ _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
