I'll tag both ways then, or better map none at all? Shirt, another dilemma. I need something stronger than tea.
Peter Elderson Op wo 16 dec. 2020 om 17:04 schreef Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org>: > Dec 16, 2020, 16:49 by tomasstrau...@gmail.com: > > 2020-12-16, tr, 17:04 Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging rašė: > > I agree that it is useful only for primitive rendering of water areas > (that possibly filters water areas by area but does not distinguish > between lakes and rivers). It may be worth mentioning. > > But it is also the most typical and common way of rendering things. > > > How do you decide that it is most typical and common way of rendering > things? > ALL maps I created or seen in GIS/Cartography world, be it online or > printed, interpret water classes differently, especially > basins/riverbanks... > > Then I can you show some map style that do it differently and > render all types of water areas in the same way (some > render also labels in the same way, with exception > for linear features) > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/54.3643/18.7150 > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/54.3666/18.7138&layers=C > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/54.3666/18.7138&layers=T > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/54.3666/18.7138&layers=H > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/54.3666/18.7138&layers=T> > > In contrast > https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/54.3666/18.7138&layers=O > <https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/54.3666/18.7138&layers=T> > appears to distinguish seas/oceans > > Best system is to use codes, not names for keys/values, but that is a > totally different "saga". > > Feel free to propose this one. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
