2020-12-16, tr, 01:32 Brian M. Sperlongano rašė: > The iD editor preset appears to use water=reservoir while the JOSM > preset appears to use landuse=reservoir.
Not entirely correct. * JOSM gives freedom to mappers and supports BOTH. * iD forces to use water=reservoir and evenmore pushes users to change tagging by disguise of "upgrade" - therefore even mappers who do not understand/know the difference are inclined to change the tagging. <- this is the reason for current stats My understanding is that given landuse=reservoir is the original water schema, the new one should show some benefits to replace the original one? Or we do not care about consistency and simply go on with replacing very prominent schemas for no good reason? My take is that: * landuse=reservoir is better compared to natural=water+water=x because it pushes mappers to make distinction for these GIS/Cartographically very different classes of water. Therefore if landuse=reservoir is deprecated tagging will be worse. What are the benefits of water=reservoir? Given that full scope of proposal to put all water classes under natural=water (the purpose which is disadvantageous from GIS/Cartography perspective) have failed and we're now only talking about two classes of water (natural and man made), and classes which are very different and therefore should not be merged. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
