> If you believe that your argument in favor of tagging reservoirs as landuse is > strong, then you should have no objection to placing this question up for a > community vote, and allowing the community the freedom to decide.
Brian, landuse=reservoir is the ORIGINAL and ACTIVE schema. Why should anybody propose the vote for it? I do not like voting on wiki because it is clearly a flawed process (as discusses a number of times), what do 20 wiki participants/people mean against the actual mappers? We could end up in the same situation as with original water=reservoir proposal where somebody with barely few months of participation in OSM and no knowledge of GIS/Carto makes/influences the decision/proposal... And what is a problem of listing benefits of water=reservoir schema? If there are none, then the only logical decision is to deprecate water=reservoir, because it would make it worse of the two. Shouldn't we get ARGUMENTS before we go to any kind of voting/decision? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
