Am Fr., 14. Okt. 2022 um 12:10 Uhr schrieb Davidoskky via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org>:
> This other fountain doesn't have such wall, thus it is not decorative > and it cannot be tagged as amenity=fountain (assuming we disregard the > recreational utility mentioned in the wiki). > > https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/56/Water_fountain_with_water_basin_near_Santiago_de_Compostela.jpg > > this other fountain happens to be decorated as well. Let's ignore this for a moment, and assume it wasn't. It could still be a decorative fountain, if it can be seen as street decor. Setting up a fountain requires some effort, so there will usually be a purpose, even if it isn't necessary now as it was when it was constructed. I would generally see amenity=fountain applicable for any fountain that is not only a drinking fountain and that is not set up as a watering place for animals only. > The shape and use of these two fountains looks the same to me. > Why would you tag them as different features? > I wouldn't > > I'm not necessarily saying they need to be tagged as amenity=fountain, > but I would expect their main tagging to be the same and maybe differ in > some secondary parameter. maybe, if you come up with an idea about these secondary parameters, we can discuss them. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
