I agree with Mateusz here: whether to tag a way after the name of a route which includes it (if it didn't have a name=* tag beforehand) isn't a "one size fits all" situation. It's difficult to describe what the right thing to do is in all cases.
> On Dec 29, 2022, at 11:18 PM, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging > <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > This does not apply everywhere, even if applies in some cases. > > Many trails are minor and their names are not actually names of roads/paths > where they lead even if this road/path is nameless. > > In Poland even for > https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C5%82%C3%B3wny_Szlak_Beskidzki > it is debatable whether its name should carry to paths and for example > almost certainly not applying to > https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wschodni_Szlak_Rowerowy_Green_Velo > > And clearly not happening with many minor trails. > > Dec 30, 2022, 03:19 by bradha...@fastmail.com: > +1 > If the only name is the route name I think it makes good sense to put it on > the local way too, that's the name of the trail. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
