There's already services offered by companies like Opensignal to do this automatically through apps. And they record actual signal strength data that one cannot access by simply pulling their phones out. Also, signal strength as a value that vary continuously over space is like elevation or climate data, there are no good way to record them inside OSM over an area.
在 2023年8月7日週一 08:58，Mike Thompson <miketh...@gmail.com> 寫道： > > > On Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 6:39 PM Evan Carroll <m...@evancarroll.com> wrote: > >> >> >> While I don't disagree, that's not an argument for OSM. OSM's job isn't >> to mitigate real world safety issues caused by technology. It's to map >> generally useful geographically verifiable things. >> > I don't understand how cell coverage isn't verifiable - visit the site > (e.g. campground) in question, pull out your phone, note how many bars, try > to make a call, send a text, use some data (perhaps run a speed test). Yes, > it is only good for your carrier, but the carrier should be recorded. Yes, > there could be network congestion, or a tower could be out, but we map > roads, and they can be congested, or closed due to accidents, flooding, > landslides, construction, etc. In some way, this is getting back to our > roots, actually getting out and surveying, rather than just relying on > satellite/aerial imagery. > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
