Possibly relevant discussion. "DKIM has no relation to envelope from. DKIM signs and protects the From: header (and others). Using envelope from for anything related to DKIM can only produce false positives, eg. common forwards."
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93764 On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Greg Troxel <g...@ir.bbn.com> wrote: > > DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; > d=gmail.com; s=20120113; > > h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to > :cc:content-type; > > Your message (direct to me) had a valid DKIM signature. It may be that > DKIM signers should not include the envelope sender. > > I tried to take an on-list message and munge the subject back to get > DKIM to pass but failed. > > The standard seems clear, so people can adjust their scores accordingly. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6377 > > (Regardless of DKIM, I am opposed to subject munging. It takes up space > and provides no value for people with adequate mail setups.) > > _______________________________________________ > tahoe-dev mailing list > tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org > https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev > >
_______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev
