On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:36:43 +1000 (EST) i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 09:21:02 +1000 (EST) > > i...@4x4falcon.com wrote: > > > >> > Nick, My worry with the Old map + yahoo combo is that some > >> > armchair mappers may over-ride existing surveyed data (I've > >> > already seen surveyed stuff over-ridden by someone looking at > >> > yahoo a few times) maybe even as far as changing the name to the > >> > old map name. :/ But I think the overall gains that will be made > >> > in getting the map to a basic usable state so the 'masses' can > >> > operate with it, and provide the detail feed back is more > >> > important. Until we have that we're just making a toy for > >> > ourselves and we can strive to make it perfect but it'll be > >> > useless to everyone else. > >> > >> > This is really simple. > > If the source=survey don't change it unless you have resurveyed it. > > Under no circumstances change source=survey data with traced data.
Yeah, what he said, although perhaps the later line could be: Under no circumstances change source=survey data with traced data unless you have obviously newer and more accurate data. Just a thought :) -- =b _______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
