----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Weait" <rich...@weait.com>
To: "David Murn" <da...@incanberra.com.au>
Cc: "talk-au" <talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Fwd: license change map
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:34 AM, David Murn <da...@incanberra.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 22:50 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:
But I also haven't yet seen any reasons, other than sheer bloody
mindedness, why
a person who was happy to contribute under a CC-BY-SA licence would be
unhappy to do so under ODbL, assuming they were able to do so.
The problem occurs because people have one account, with which they do
edits. Some of those edits are likely to come from different sources.
A very good reason why someone wouldnt wish to accept the new terms,
would be that they could have contributed data from different sources.
Dear David,
Would the ability to differentially mark changesets as "for promotion
to ODbL" and "not for promotion (with a helpful detail)" address this
concern?
The intent is to allow those with concerns about some of their data to
mark it, and accept the terms for the data they are confident in.
One imagined implementation would provide a checkbox and textfield for
each changeset. The user then checks and adds comments as required.
If this addresses your concern in this case, please let me know. I'll
be happy to summarize the replies during the LWG call in a little over
24 hours. A positive response would be lovely.
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
