----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Weait" <rich...@weait.com>
To: "David Murn" <da...@incanberra.com.au>
Cc: "talk-au" <talk-au@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Fwd: license change map



On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:34 AM, David Murn <da...@incanberra.com.au> wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 22:50 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote:

But I also haven't yet seen any reasons, other than sheer bloody mindedness, why
a person who was happy to contribute under a CC-BY-SA licence would be
unhappy to do so under ODbL, assuming they were able to do so.

The problem occurs because people have one account, with which they do
edits. Some of those edits are likely to come from different sources.
A very good reason why someone wouldnt wish to accept the new terms,
would be that they could have contributed data from different sources.

Dear David,



I realise the question was not addressed to me, but as Richard is asking for replies here's my views:

Would the ability to differentially mark changesets as "for promotion
to ODbL" and "not for promotion (with a helpful detail)" address this
concern?


Not for me it wouldn't, as its not a question of compatability with ODbL, but compatability with the proposed CT's whis is the main issue for me.

The intent is to allow those with concerns about some of their data to
mark it, and accept the terms for the data they are confident in.

One imagined implementation would provide a checkbox and textfield for
each changeset.  The user then checks and adds comments as required.

Notwithstanding the above, I guess at some stage I may have the opportunity to revisit all of the 7,700 changesets attributed to me, have a look to see if each one is compatible with the CT's and ODbL , and then mark it as such. Just don't expect all of the changesets to be marked that quickly.

However it does at least provide a possible solution. Leaving aside the technical issues of what happens to areas where I haven't yet got round to marking a changeset which affects that area, and in the meantime someone comes along and edits that areas data, and then I subsequently mark my origonal changeset affecting that area as OK.

David


If this addresses your concern in this case, please let me know.  I'll
be happy to summarize the replies during the LWG call in a little over
24 hours.  A positive response would be lovely.

_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au











_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to