On 8 April 2011 10:06, Ben Last <ben.l...@nearmap.com> wrote:
>
> To be clear; we're not "refusing" anything - our licence has remained the 
> same since we launched, and we haven't changed it.  The new OSM CTs are 
> incompatible with it.

Several people have made similar comments, they looked into the
license OSM-F was publishing their work under and was happy that it
was strong copyleft, and that is the only reason they submitted
contributions to OSM-F, otherwise we might as well all be working for
google for free, especially since they have better aerial imagery than
Bing and yahoo etc...

_______________________________________________
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au

Reply via email to